Under the weight of record snows, roofs across the Northeast have been buckling this winter, raining debris on children skating in ice rinks, crushing cows and tractors in farmers’ barns and even flattening a garage full of antique cars. In December, nearly 18 inches of new heavy snow brought down the roof of the Metrodome in Minneapolis, forcing the Vikings to temporarily relocate to Detroit.
And it was not just American infrastructure that appeared to be under the weather, so to speak. In Brisbane, Australia, January stormsripped apart a riverside boardwalk — turning a concrete section 150 yards long into a waterborne torpedo that threatened downstream bridges. The wall of a Hungarian reservoir holding toxic red sludge crumbled in October after weeks of downpours, sending the waste into nearby villages. The litany of extreme weather events has often left local officials scrambling to respond to each new crisis, looking — by turns pathetic and heroic — like the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dike, trying to fend off nature’s monumental forces.
Global warming is most likely responsible, at least in part, for the rising frequency and severity of extreme weather events — like floods, storms and droughts — since warmer surface temperatures tend to produce more violent weather patterns, scientists say. And the damage these events have caused is a sign that the safety factors that engineers, architects and planners have previously built into structures are becoming inadequate for the changing climate.
Dikes, buildings and bridges are often built to withstand a “hundred-year storm” — an event so epic that there is a 1 percent chance it will happen in a given year. But what happens when 100-year storms are seen every 10 years, and 10-year storms become regular events? How many structures will reach their limits?
Engineers and insurers are already facing these questions. Munich Re, one of the world’s largest insurance companies, says climate-related events serious enough to cause property damage have risen significantly since 1980: extreme floods tripled and extreme windstorms nearly so. (The number of damaging earthquakes — which are not thought to be influenced by climate change — have remained stable.) Statistics show that the frequency of days with heavy precipitation is up in South America, North America and parts of Europe.
“Your own perception that there are more storms and more flooding causing damage — that is extremely well documented,” said Peter Hoeppe, a meteorologist who is the head of Munich Re’s Corporate Climate Center. “There is definitely a plausible link to climate change.”
For insurers, the challenge has been how to insure structures against the vicissitudes of increasingly extreme and severe weather. For engineers, new weather raises difficult questions about what kinds of safety factors should be built into designs and whether old structures need retrofitting or reinforcing.
“As we get more extreme events, that absolutely changes how we design,” said D. Wayne Klotz, president of the American Society of Civil Engineers, who has raised the topic repeatedly at the society’s meetings. “We could stick our heads in the ground and say nothing is changing. But it is.”
Mr. Klotz, a water engineer in Houston, said his professional colleagues look carefully at the changing statistics about factors like weather, and over time alter building methods and plans accordingly. Engineers design for the biggest flood or highest winds that seem plausible at a given time. The drainage systems Mr. Klotz builds now are different from those he engineered 20 years ago, because he knows that the Gulf Coast now has much heavier storms.
Unfortunately, he said, the municipal building codes that govern minimum standards for many structures often lag behind “what is happening in the real world,” because of the slow pace of lawmaking. At the same time, a bad economy makes countries, companies and individuals disinclined to invest in higher levels of protection.
Individual engineers are “really aware of the predictions” about climate and might, for example, suggest altering a design to accommodate a future sea level rise, he said. But raising foundations or building higher dikes has a cost, and owners often have a short-term view.
“I’d like to tell you there is a vigorous forum where we’ve locked arms and are trying to scientifically figure out how to respond to the predictions,” said Mr. Klotz. “But there is not yet a concerted effort to change design codes to accommodate them.”
Widely varying predictions about climate change make it especially hard for engineers to build for the future — or for insurers to guard against weather-related losses. Indeed, scientists do not entirely understand the complex ways in which warmer temperatures influence weather.
Last month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said 2010 had tied for the warmest year on record in terms of land and sea surface temperatures. At the simplest level, a warmer ocean surface means more evaporation into the atmosphere — and all that extra water has to come down somewhere, probably accounting for more frequent and severe storms. But it is not easy to predict which places will suffer snow or rain and which will experience drought.
Munich Re is already tailoring its offerings to a world of more extreme weather. It is a matter of financial survival: In 2008, heavy snows in China resulted in the collapse of 223,000 homes, according to Chinese government statistics, including $1 billion in insured losses, Dr. Hoeppe said.
Homes built to resist higher winds will qualify for lower premiums. Floodplains need to be wider than in the past, and Munich Re will not cover structures built in overly risk-prone areas.
In most parts of the developed world, people will probably make the necessary adjustments. This winter, travelers were stranded for days at airports in parts of Europe and the United States, as severe snowstorms interrupted flights. But, Dr. Hoeppe noted, air traffic continued almost normally in places like Helsinki, Finland, which is used to heavy snows. “Perhaps we’ll have to learn to deal with more snowfall — extreme snowfall,” he said. “We’ll have to get used to that.”
But as engineers and architects sit down at their drafting tables to design structures for the next 100 years, they want to know how extreme is extreme when it comes to weather. “There’s not enough money to design for every eventuality,” said Mr. Klotz. “You try to design for the worst-case scenario. But the question now is, what you can expect?”