Search This Blog

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Plastic fantastic! Carrier bags 'not eco-villains after all'

Plastic fantastic! Carrier bags 'not eco-villains after all'

Unpublished Environment Agency research shows polythene may be less harmful than cotton or paper

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Plastic carrier bags have had a bad press

GETTY IMAGES

Plastic carrier bags have had a bad press

SPONSORED LINKS
Ads by Google

Earth Friendly Snacks
Enjoy A Variety of All Natural
Frito-Lay® Recipes & Snacks Today!
Frito-Lay.com/Our-Planet

Fair & Ethical brands
Get listed in an Index for organic,
fair trade and eco-friendly brands.
thefairpages.com

High Density Polyethylene
HDPE industrial sheet, rollstock
and cutting board, 877.527.8424
www.TheCuttingBoardFactory.com

Green Products
100's of Green products for home,
office, business. Free Shipping!
LetsGoGreen.biz

Unpublished Government research suggests the plastic carrier may not be an eco villain after all – but, whisper it, an unsung hero. Hated by environmentalists and shunned by shoppers, the disposable plastic bag is piling up in a shame-filled corner of retail history. But a draft report by the Environment Agency, obtained by the Independent on Sunday, has found that ordinary high density polythene (HDPE) bags used by shops are actually greener than supposedly low impact choices.

HDPE bags are, for each use, almost 200 times less damaging to the climate than cotton hold-alls favoured by environmentalists, and have less than one third of the Co2 emissions than paper bags which are given out by retailers such as Primark.

The findings suggest that, in order to balance out the tiny impact of each lightweight plastic bag, consumers would have to use the same cotton bag every working day for a year, or use paper bags at least thrice rather than sticking them in the bin or recycling.

Most paper bags are used only once and one study assumed cotton bags were used only 51 times before being discarded, making them – according to this new report – worse than single-use plastic bags.

However, despite being commissioned in 2005 and scheduled for publication in 2007, the research has not been released to the public.

Officially, the Environment Agency says the report, Life Cycle Assessment of Supermarket Carrier Bags, by Dr Chris Edwards and Jonna Meyhoff Fry, is still being peer reviewed. However it was submitted to the peer review process “more than a year ago”. Despite the long peer review the Environment Agency does not have a date for its publication, except to say that it will be soon.

The report set out to find out which of seven types of bags have the lowest environmental impact by assessing pollution caused by extraction of raw materials, production, transportation and disposal.

It found that an HDPE plastic bag would have a baseline global warming potential of 1.57 kg Co2 equivalent, falling to 1.4 kg Co2e if re-used once, the same as a paper bag used four times (1.38 kg Co2e).

A cotton bag would have to be re-used 171 times to emit a similar level, 1.57 kg Co2e.

The researchers concluded: “The HDPE bag had the lowest environmental impacts of the single use options in nine of the 10 impact categories. The bag performed well because it was the lightest single use bag considered.”

The 96-page report comes amid an ongoing controversy over plastic bags and plans by Wales to introduce a 5p plastic bag tax in October.

Six billion plastic bags are used across the UK annually and there is no doubt that they cause environmental problems such as litter and marine pollution as well as using up oil, and limiting their use and re-using them reduces their harm.

However the new report suggests that if shoppers to switch to alternatives, they have to use those time and time again to be greener.

Barry Turner, chief executive of the Packaging and Films Association, which represents plastic bag manufacturers, suggested the report had been “suppressed.” “They [the Environment Agency] have kept it fairly quiet and tried to suppress things,” he said.

“This [report] has dragged on and on. It was a report that could have been done relatively quickly, probably within 12 months but it has gone on for years.

“If these are the conclusions that have arrived at it wouldn’t really surprise me. It was buried because it didn’t give the right answers. It doesn’t support the political thrust at the moment.”

He added: “People at CEO level [in retailers] have been consistently telling Wrap [the publicly-funded Waste and Resources Action Programme] and Defra [Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] that they have been missing the point. They have had very closed ears on this and I have never have been able to understand why they have been so rigid in their approach.”

The Environment Agency denied the report had been suppressed. “No. The initial draft went to the review panel just over a year ago but they have not been constantly engaged in the review,” he said.

“We amended the report after the comments from the first review and then the revised report was resubmitted to them last summer but, because it was a panel and because of their other commitments, it has taken them some time to complete. We expect this to be completed shortly.”

Asked whether the draft findings had been seriously challenged, he said the reviewers had “questioned some aspects of the original draft, although much was about emphasis and balance.”

The report brings to mind another life-cycle assessment carried out by the Environment Agency, into disposable nappies, which suggested that reusable "eco" nappies were typically more damaging to the environment than disposables such as Pampers because washing uses so much carbon-emitting electricity.

Following publication of that report, the Government dropped its advice for parents to use eco nappies. The Womens Environmental Network also dropped its campaign.

So which bag should you use?

All bags have an impact. The best solution would be to use a cotton bag several hundred times, probably using it constantly for years. If you are not going to do that, a plastic bag – re-used as a bin liner – is the next best option, better than paper. Avoid accepting a plastic bag unless you need one, though.


http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/plastic-fantastic-carrier-bags-not-ecovillains-after-all-2220129.html

Saturday, February 19, 2011

BMW Activate the Future

WHEREVER YOU WANT TO GO!

Heesang, you (and everyone else) NEED to watch these 4 movies - if you haven't already...!

It is a great production by BMW, where they are trying to give people a peek of what the future will bring.

http://bmwactivatethefuture.com/

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Another article about Amazon Kindle's page numbering


February 8, 2011, 4:45 PM

Page Numbers for Kindle Books an Imperfect Solution

Since the dawn of the Kindle, there’s been one quirky little feature that has baffled or thrilled the multitudes: page numbers.
The Kindle e-book reader has always displayed its own “location numbers” rather than page numbers. Why? Because page numbers make no sense on an e-book. If you make the type larger or smaller, the page numbering would change. A 100-page book becomes 200 pages long when you double the type size.
Amazon’s Kindle will have page numbers that correspond to real books.Amazon’s Kindle will have page numbers that correspond to real books.
Or what should happen when you read the first 15 pages of a book on your Kindle, and then continue on your iPod Touch? Obviously, only a fraction as much text appears on the small screen, so the page numbering wouldn’t match.
That’s why Amazon invented “location numbers” that correspond to the bits of text on the screen, consistently on any screen and at at any time size—not paper page numbers. (Otherwise, you’d get citations like: “’I regret that I have but one life to give for my country,’ says Nathan Hale on page 384 when viewed using the Arial font, 14-point size on the 13-inch MacBook Air screen.”)
Seemed logical enough at the time. Unfortunately, this system causes headaches for anyone who has to make specific citations: a student writing a paper, for example, a teacher giving reading assignments, or someone trying to follow along at a book club.
Barnes & Noble’s Nook books use a different system. Its page numbers correspond to the physical pages of the book, solving one problem but introducing others.
Amazon has finally tackled this problem, as you’ll see in the next Kindle software update. (It’s available now as an Early Preview.) Kindle books will give you the option of either system: “location” numbers that remain attached to the same passages no matter what the screen or type size, and page numbers that reflect where you are in the printed book. The real page numbers, of course, may display some weirdness—you might swipe your finger to “turn the page” on your iPhone, but the page number won’t change. Or you may adjust the type size and see the page number change (because the displayed page number corresponds to whatever word is at the top left of the screen).
All of this requires some rejiggering of the existing e-book files; Amazon has already converted “tens of thousands” of books and will soon update its Kindle reading apps for iPhone, Android and so on, to take advantage of the new feature.
Bottom line: enough criticizing the Kindle or the Nook for the way they handle page numbers. Neither solution is perfect—“locations” or page numbers—because the problem is unsolvable. The best we can hope for is a choice — and now the Kindle offers one.

Monday, February 14, 2011

My presentation on hypothesis testing from Monday, February 14, 2011

China and Colombia announce 'alternative Panama Canal'

Colombia has announced it is negotiating with China to build an alternative to the Panama Canal.

The proposed transport route is intended to promote the flow of goods between Asia and Latin America.

The plan is to create a "dry canal" where the Pacific port of Buenaventura would be linked by rail, across Colombia, to the Atlantic Coast.

Trade between Colombia and China has increased from $10m in 1980 to more than $5bn last year.

The announcement came from the Colombian president, Juan Manuel Santos, who told the Financial Times that the project was "a real proposal... and it is quite advanced".

China has been increasing its involvement across Latin America to feed a growing need for raw materials and commodities.

According to BBC Bogota correspondent Jeremy McDermott, President Santos has departed from the emphasis on security of his predecessor Alvaro Uribe.

Mr Uribe's Democratic Security Policy, backed by US military aid, is credited with halving the numbers of Marxist rebels and pushing them into the more remote jungles and mountains.

Mr Santos is concentrating on what he calls "democratic prosperity", our correspondent says.

He hopes that economic development will address some of the root issues of the 46-year civil conflict, such as poverty and the lack of opportunities, which have pushed people into being rebels or into the lucrative drug trade, our correspondent says.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

amazing new idea for creating vivid 3D soundscapes


Notes on the Search for Startling Innovations in 3D Audio

All print journalism now trails an Internet shadow: the digital version, a Platonic reflection consisting of what might have been if you could have elaborated, footnoted, and linked far beyond the margins of the lines on the page.On paper, the limits of space -- of word counts and ad/edit ratios and the cost of printing and distribution -- exist in an inverse relationship to the extensibility of online prose. In broadcast media, where the limiting factor is time, you encounter a similar kind of extensibility whenever Jon Stewart winds up a Daily Show interview segment with a frustrated unwillingness to stop, announcing that the conversation will continue off the air and "we'll throw the whole thing up on the Internet."
Information in general wants to be free, but online text, with a nominal distribution cost approaching zero, really is free, and every time I commit my professional words to paper these days, I immediately begin scheming to scoop up the words and ideas and connections that were left on the cutting-room floor, and reconstitute them online.
For the March issue of The Atlantic, I contributed a report on startling innovations in 3D audio as developed by Edgar Choueiri, a professor of applied physics at Princeton University. (Read "What Perfection Sounds Like.") In this post, I'd like to unpack the Internet shadow of this particular article of mine by presenting a few notes on useful background information and context that travels in the slipstream of the finished product, along with some deleted scenes from my encounter with Professor Choueiri.
The recent and increasingly chastened hysteria over visual 3D movies and TV has its counterpart in a parallel gold rush to commercialize 3D audio.
My dispatch on a very specific something new under the hi-fi sun points toward overarching questions about the general state of audio innovation, and this assignment sent me into the heart of those fascinating inquiries. My experience, ears, judgment, and research convince me that Edgar Choueiri's 3D audio algorithms and playback system represent a dramatic improvement in the spatial realism and virtual sound-staging of stereo. It's an achievement whose novelty and pleasurable impact justifies the hyperbole of the article's title. (Ideally, his sound filter requires recordings of an actual soundstage and ambience; it doesn't work at all with mono recording, and it provides only a variable degree of improvement in some dubiously engineered pop concoctions, where the spatial location of voices and instrumentals is simulated at a mixing board by a technique called "pan-potted mono.")
It's important, however, to stipulate that Choueiri's Pure Stereo is a culmination of research on crosstalk cancellation conducted by a far-flung community of engineers over many years. Science is never wholly original. One of the trickiest challenges of science and technology journalism is how to accurately characterize innovative achievement in a clear and distinctive light, while giving due consideration to the wider range of work in the field. Putting one guy's beautiful solution in bold relief risks obscuring the surrounding network of colleagues (and competitors) along with the deep bibliography of research that stands behind any truly significant breakthrough.
One crucial predecessor of Choueiri's is Ralph Glasgal, whose earlier work on crosstalk cancellation and ambience simulation has proceeded under the rubric of Ambiophonics. Glasgal's website is an illuminating resource. Bob Carver, an ingenious and storied pioneer of audio design, made a somewhat Ahab-like stab at an analog solution to 3D audio some 40 years ago, and dubbed his technology Sonic Holography. (Choueiri has a vintage Carver Sonic Holography Generator Model C-9 in his gear rack at his Princeton lab.) Another hotspot in audio science is the Institute of Sound and Vibration Research at the U.K.'s University of Southhampton. Choueiri's decision to focus on 2-channel stereo 3D was based in part on the Southhampton lab's successful implementation of crosstalk cancellation with six speakers.
The recent and increasingly chastened hysteria over visual 3D movies and TV has its counterpart in a parallel gold rush to commercialize 3D audio. Princeton's 3D audio technology will doubtless become available to consumers soon, but it's just one player in a proliferating 3D sound multiverse. The industry sent out an important signal last year with the establishment of the 3D Audio Alliance (3DAA), a trade group devoted to pooling knowledge and creating technical standards. (This recent episode of TWiT's Home Theater Geeks podcast is devoted to the 3DAA launch, featuring Alan Kraemer of SRS Labs, Inc., a leading purveyor of "advanced audio enhancement.") Hearing Choueiri's 3D audio demo was even more exciting for me than the sometimes thrilling cinema 3D ofAvatar. It might be worth betting that 3D audio has a better prospect for success in the near future than a thousand James Camerons breaking the fourth wall on screens everywhere.
One of the reasons you don't hear much about genuine audio innovation is that the audiophile press practices a blatant silo journalism, narrowly focused on refinement rather than advancement. There's absolutely nothing wrong with refinement; in the right circumstances it creates a valuable and highly significant species of progress. Gadgets like the brilliant new HRT iStreamer mean that iPhones and iPads can now become uncompromising high-end audio source components. Cheap digital storage removes any practical barrier to playing uncompressed high-definition audio files. The vinyl resurgence is not a purely nostalgic exercise: improvements in cartridges, turntables, and phono amps lets us hear the full sonic potential of old LPs that vintage gear could never reveal. A well-designed 21st century amplifier with mid-20th century vacuum tubes can seduce the ear forperfectly up-to-date reasons.
But refinement is for connoisseurs, not pioneers and creators. Nothing puts the baroque artisanal excesses of hi-fi in perspective faster than spending time with hard-headed audio engineers in the recording industry or researchers at university audio labs, where experiment and the scientific method trump silly gold-plated luxe. Reading about high-quality audio would be much more fun if news from these scruffy studio boffins, pro gear vendors, and bleeding-edge psychoacoustic academicians became a steady part of the conversation.
Born in Lebanon in 1961, Choueiri was an Apollo-age science and audio geek, the only 13-year-old in the country with a quadrophonic sound system.
The relatively primitive level of spatial music reproduction has been a blind spot in audio journalism, despite never-ending hype about hi-fi that sounds like the real thing. Now engineers and physicists like Choueiri, who can harness the mathematics of wave theory and write powerful audio software algorithms, are about to give us all wonderful new sonic gifts. While we wait for Choueiri's Pure Stereo to arrive, a closely related and equally mind-boggling digital signal-processing technology is already available from Smyth Research. Rather than 3D audio through loudspeakers, Smyth's Realiser A8 system provides headphone listeners with sound that is indistinguishable from playback through loudspeakers. The system's ability to emulate exact room and speaker configurations is said to be uncanny, defeating everything that seems unnatural about listening. Stereophile's Kal Rubenstein was suitably agog. "I couldn't believe it," he wrote in a detailed review. "For the first time in my life, headphone listening was not only convincing but enjoyable."
When I left Choueiri in Princeton, he was immersed in the next stage of his research. For true stereo (including his Pure Stereo), you have to listen in a delimited "sweet spot" between the two speakers. Choueiri is now working on an extension of his 3D filter that will work with a multi-speaker array to produce what he calls "the holy grail -- multiple sweet spots." Meaning two, three, four or more listeners in a room could hear the same spatially realistic sound at the same time -- a profound boon for social listening and home theater watching with a group.
UPDATE: Choueri has just announced that on January 25th he successfully produced three distinct sweet spots "using a special non-conventional loudspeaker technology in combination with my optimized XTC filters." He added, "The extension to more sweet spots is relatively trivial."
Finally, a few notes about Choueiri himself, a fascinating character worthy of an in-depth profile.
Born in Lebanon in 1961, Choueiri was an Apollo-age science and audio geek, the only 13-year-old in the country with a quadrophonic sound system. He sketched rooms with walls made of loudspeakers, and tape-recorded a message admonishing his future 30-year-old self to be devoting his life to the science of space exploration. When civil war broke out in 1975, he went abroad to study in France and the U.S. He earned his Ph.D. at Princeton and stayed on to become a full professor and director* of the university's Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory. (In 2009, Choueiri wrote an excellent article for Scientific American, "New Dawn for Electric Rockets" [PDF link], about the history, state of the art, and cutting edge of plasma and electric rockets. The magazine also posted an accompanying video produced by Space Channel France.)
Choueiri is a seriously committed audiophile, and his home setup features a vintage Studer master reel-to-reel tape recorder/player*, a monster VPI turntable, and a home-brewed version of his Pure Stereo filter. His ability to produce, in his listening room, a just slightly less amazing quality of 3D audio than his laboratory setup is a testament to the promise of universal accessibility his work offers. (You can even get a serious inkling of that sound via this video posted at the Princeton 3D Audio and Applied Acoustics Laboratory website.).
His remarkable music collection includes hundreds of vintage classical and jazz releases (including the very first commercially available stereo recording of a major performance, a pair of March 1954 sessions with Fritz Reiner and the Chicago Symphony playing Also Sprach Zarathustra andEin Heldenleben), and a fantastic archive of second-generation master tapes. He played one of those masters, from an unreleased Bob Dylan session in March 1970: it was astonishingly vivid, especially with the help of the Pure Stereo filter.
Choueiri's intensive work on 3D audio has had one slightly melancholy outcome. Audio used to be his hobby, a way to relax, now it's come to be a part of his professional life. So he's now learning magic.
__________________________________________________________________
This post originally stated that Professor Choueiri was the founder of the Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory and that his home featured an Ampex tape deck. We regret the error.
Image: Taylor Callery.

ny times article discussing ways that innovative products often retain elements of earlier designs


Why Innovation Doffs an Old Hat

Just as the average human carries around the remnants of a prehistoric tail and a useless appendix, the tools we use also bear marks of the evolutionary process from which they arose.
Jennifer Daniel
Digital cameras produce a reassuringly retro but artificial shutter snap when you push the button to take a photograph; cellphones have keyboards with layouts originally meant to keep typewriters from jamming; and blue jeans have pockets that are a throwback to a time when watches dangled from chains.
Add to that list Amazon’s e-reader, the Kindle, which will now supplement its “location numbers” with page numbers that correspond to physical books. The change, announced last week, does have a practical purpose — especially for book clubs, whose digital readers presumably will no longer have trouble looking up the same page as analog readers.
But there is also a sense of absurdity here. E-books, by definition, do not have pages. Depending on which size font someone uses, she may have to advance the screen many times before “turning a page.” Then there are the questions of how to approach books with many physical editions, or texts that exist only in digital space.
But decisions like Amazon’s are not based on practicality alone.
“The location numbers on a Kindle are rational, and they make sense for the medium — but they don’t correspond to the emotional expectations of what a book is,” said Adam Greenfield, managing director of Urbanscale, a New York-based urban design practice, and author of “Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing.”
Designers in all fields are regularly confronted with versions of this choice: whether to incorporate cues to keep people grounded in what has come before, or scrap convention completely. In transportation, for instance, the power of steam engines was initially described in relation to that of horses, a practice that has continued to the present day. Automobile designers have incorporated visual cues suggesting carriages; for example, adding nonfunctional spokes on wheels. Today, electric cars, which can operate with unsettling silence, are being designed to make more noise, largely for safety reasons.
Such design is also common in the digital world. The basic interface for personal computers was designed as a desktop with a series of folders and a trash can in the corner because it allowed users to work in the way they were used to doing in the physical world.
But referencing the past can serve to dampen the imagination of designers working on disruptive products, said Bill Moggridge, the director of the Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum, and the author of “Designing Interactions,” a history of digital design.
“The tendency is to use a form of conservatism,” he said. “You just make it look like what was there before. But if you want to create something truly innovative, the utility of that starts to fade.”
This tension is palpable in many efforts to create new digital media experiences. The Daily, Rupert Murdoch’s publication designed specifically for tablet computers, incorporates video and interactivity into what is essentially a newspaper. At the same time, it is designed to show up on a reader’s digital doorstep once a day, a concept that seems as old-fashioned as pocket watches when compared with Web sites that are updated continually.
Apple, probably the best symbol of the march into a new digital era, also encourages designers to incorporate analog references in its devices. On the iPad, users enter appointments into a calendar that is encased in an on-screen leather ledger, scrawl notes on what looks like a legal pad and advance through digital books by swiping their fingers across the screen, prompting an animation that actually looks like a page being turned.
Such superfluous references to the past are known as skeuomorphs (from the Greek words for tool and form), and Apple’s fondness for them on the iPad has provoked criticism from some designers.
“It drives a lot of designers batty because it is so skeuomorphically heavy,” said Craig Mod, a designer for Flipboard, a magazine for the iPad.
Amazon, by contrast, has faithfully recreated the experience of book reading by building on its innovations with the Kindle, said Mr. Mod. Because the screen is not backlit, and the battery can last for a month, and it is small and light enough to get lost in a pile of papers, the Kindle does seem like a fresh take on the idea of a paperback book, he said.
Of course, there are tradeoffs. Shopping for books in the device’s store consists of scrolling through listings of titles, an experience that feels more akin to searching a database than browsing in a bookstore. But if this means that Amazon’s customers are less likely to judge e-books by their covers, at least some readers would consider that to be true progress.